After a shooting, attention often turns to the shooter, but the law also asks whether the business or property owner could have prevented the violence. In North Carolina, businesses have a duty to keep their premises reasonably safe, especially if they knew—or should have known—about the risk. If they failed to act, they may be legally responsible for the harm that occurred.
And if you were hurt, you may have grounds to hold the property owner accountable, not just the person who fired the gun.
What Premises Liability Means When Gun Violence Happens
In North Carolina, premises liability applies when a business fails to provide adequate security in the face of a known danger, like rising crime or a history of violent altercations.
That doesn’t mean property owners have to prevent every single incident. But if there were signs—if there was reason to believe something like this could happen—they can’t just ignore those red flags. They have a duty to take reasonable security measures. And when they fail, they may be held liable for the outcome.
That’s why when we handle shooting cases involving restaurants or other businesses, we look closely at what the owner knew—or should have known—and what they did (or didn’t do) to keep people safe.
What We Need to Prove in a Negligent Security Case
If you’re thinking about holding the business accountable after a shooting, here’s what your case will need to show:
1. The Business Had a Legal Duty to Protect You
If you were at the restaurant as a customer, the law is on your side. Business owners in North Carolina owe what’s called a duty of care to their guests—which means they’re responsible for keeping the place reasonably safe. That includes preventing foreseeable threats like violent altercations or active shooters when there’s been a pattern of concern.
2. The Violence Wasn’t Entirely Unexpected
No one expects a gunman to walk into a restaurant. But in legal terms, the question isn’t whether the exact moment could be predicted—it’s whether there were warning signs. Did the place have a history of fights? Were the police called there before? Did the area have a known issue with gun violence?
Things that might show the shooting was foreseeable include:
- Past violent incidents at the same location or nearby
- A known issue with rowdy customers or specific groups
- A pattern of fights, threats, or law enforcement visits
- High-crime surroundings or a failure to adjust security accordingly
- Alcohol service without proper safety planning
These things matter. If the business ignored signs like these, a court may find they were negligent in providing proper security.
3. They Didn’t Do Enough to Keep People Safe
Once we’ve shown the threat was foreseeable, the next step is proving the business didn’t respond the way it should have. What counts as adequate security depends on the situation, but some common examples include:
- Bringing in security guards during busy hours
- Installing working security cameras and lighting
- Making sure staff are trained on how to handle dangerous behavior
- Having policies for checking bags or limiting access
- Taking action when repeat troublemakers show up
- Contacting law enforcement when problems arise
Failing to take these kinds of reasonable steps—especially when there’s a known risk—can open the door to a negligent security lawsuit.
4. Their Inaction Contributed to Your Injuries
The last piece is showing that their failure actually made things worse. Maybe better lighting would’ve prevented someone from sneaking into a side entrance. Maybe trained security could’ve stopped the shooter before things escalated. Maybe a call to police earlier in the night would’ve changed everything.
We often work with experts—security consultants, law enforcement, and others—to connect the dots. Their testimony can show how the business’s lack of preparation or awareness played a direct role in what happened to you.
What You May Be Able to Recover After a Restaurant Shooting
If a business failed to provide reasonable security, and that failure contributed to what happened, you may be able to hold them accountable. North Carolina law allows injured victims to recover compensation for both financial losses and the more personal, harder-to-measure impacts.
Medical Bills, Lost Wages, and Other Direct Costs
These are the financial losses that usually come first. Depending on the severity of your injuries, you may be dealing with:
- ER visits, surgery, and follow-up medical care
- Prescription medications or physical therapy
- Time away from work—and the paychecks that were missed
- Long-term limits on your ability to work or return to your career
- Damaged belongings—clothing, glasses, phones, or anything else affected during the incident
These are often the easiest to document, but they’re just one part of the picture.
The Emotional and Physical Toll
Then there’s everything that doesn’t come with a receipt. After a violent event like this, people often carry emotional and physical injuries that last far longer than anyone expects.
You may be entitled to compensation for:
- Physical pain tied to your injuries
- Anxiety, PTSD, or ongoing trauma
- Losing the ability to enjoy the life you had before
- Permanent injuries, scarring, or disability
- Struggles in your relationships caused by what you’ve been through
These are called non-economic damages, and while they’re not as simple to calculate, they’re just as real—and just as important.
Why These Cases Often Come With Legal Challenges
Proving that a business is legally responsible for a shooting isn’t always straightforward. Even when there were warning signs or a pattern of violence, property owners and their insurers often push back hard.
“We Had No Way of Knowing”
It’s common for businesses to argue that the shooting was completely unforeseeable—that they couldn’t have known or done anything to prevent it. But we know that’s not always true.
If there were repeated incidents, calls to police, known security concerns, or other red flags, that argument may not hold up. That’s where our team brings in outside experts—people who understand what reasonable security looks like and whether it could have changed the outcome.
Insurance Complications
Another common issue is insurance coverage. Some business policies try to exclude violent criminal acts, and that gives insurance companies a reason to delay, deny, or underpay claims.
In some cases, we have to handle separate disputes with insurers who refuse to step up. That part of the case can be just as important as the claim against the property owner.
Blaming the Victim
North Carolina’s contributory negligence rule is strict. If the defense can show that you contributed in any way to what happened—even a little—it could jeopardize your ability to recover anything at all.
Sometimes that means the other side tries to shift blame to the victim. Maybe there was an argument beforehand, or maybe the setting was tense. But there’s a difference between being nearby and being responsible.
Most courts understand that. Still, we prepare for that argument from day one, because it comes up often—and it has to be taken seriously.
If You Lost a Loved One in a Restaurant Shooting
There’s no easy way to talk about it. Losing someone to a shooting is devastating—and when it happens in a place that was supposed to be safe, it leaves behind more than just grief. It raises hard questions. Could this have been prevented? Did someone fail to do what they should have done?
In North Carolina, if a restaurant or other business didn’t take reasonable steps to protect its patrons—and that failure played a part in the tragedy—you may have the right to file a wrongful death claim. It’s not about placing blame for the sake of it. It’s about accountability. And it’s about giving the family a way to recover some of what was lost—financially and otherwise.
What a Wrongful Death Claim Covers
No amount of money makes things right. But if you’re left facing medical bills, funeral expenses, or the loss of someone who supported your household, the law gives you a way to seek help.
These claims may include:
- Income your loved one would have earned
- Medical care they received before passing
- Funeral and burial costs
- The emotional weight carried by spouses, children, and close family
- What they went through—their pain and suffering, if they survived for any time after the injury
North Carolina has specific rules about who can bring these claims and when. It’s important not to wait too long.
What Goes Into Proving the Case
In these cases, evidence doesn’t last. Cameras record over footage. Memories blur. People move away. That’s why, when we take on a case like this, we start the investigation immediately.
We look at everything we can:
- What the police found
- Who was there and what they saw
- Any security footage—inside the restaurant or nearby
- What kind of safety procedures the business had in place, if any
- Whether there were other incidents at the same location before
- Whether staff were trained to handle violence—or if they were trained at all
- What doctors and first responders can tell us about the timeline of events
We also work with people who know security—former law enforcement officers, consultants, professionals who can look at the facts and tell us, plainly, whether the restaurant did what it should have.
If they didn’t—and if that failure played a role—then the business owner may be held legally responsible. That’s what we work to prove.
Experience Makes a Difference in These Cases
At Johnson & Groninger PLLC, we know how to approach these cases from every angle. That includes working with the right experts, understanding premises liability, and holding businesses accountable when they fail to protect their customers. Our background dealing with insurers gives us a clear view of how to protect your interests from the start.
If you or someone you love was injured in a restaurant shooting, we encourage you to reach out to us. We’re here to help you understand your rights and what steps you can take next.
